Jury Procedures
Effective 4/1/05

Last Revised: 04/10/05
(Minor Revisions: 5/29/06, 7/27/06, 3/14/07, 3/15/08)
(Round 2)

Purpose: Application process for basic juried member status.

Eligible Participants: Business Members in good standing.

Judges: Juried Members in good standing.

Judging Guidelines: See the attached guidelines document.



Submission Guidelines:
READ THE JUDGING GUIDELINES!! Submit images of 6-8 pieces that take the judging criteria into account, including the creativity and versatility aspects. Feel free to include more than one shot of each to show close-up detail, side views, back views, or any other view that you think would enable a person to make a better judgement of the piece. Please limit these extra shots to no more than 3 per piece. Short, concise descriptions should be submitted with each image, listing wire information, stone selection, etc.

Pay attention to the pictures you are submitting. The camera is like a microscope, it shows off all flaws in the work. Make sure the picture is close enough that people can see if there are flaws or not, or you are likely to rate a "can't tell" instead of a score. Pick pieces that the camera likes rather just pieces that you like. Creativity can not be at the expense of workmanship.

Submit clear/sharp .jpg images that are ready for posting on the web with no further editing required. They should be sized to be no more than 500 pixels tall or 500 pixels wide (ex: not 500 pixels tall and 800 pixels wide)
File size should be in the 20KB to 60KB range. In general, photos will not be shown at greater than 450 pixels on the web site.

Send your email with descriptions and attached files to - jury@WireJewelryArtists.org.


Mechanics:
A web editor will monitor the jury@WireJewelryArtists.org email address for submissions. As submissions are received, the next available number will be assigned and the submission will be posted to the web site. An email will be sent to the jury pool asking them to vote, giving any required instructions, and giving them the email address to return their vote to.

The web editor(s) do not need to make any judgement calls regarding the photos. They can just post them and leave it up to the jury pool to decide if the image quality is too poor to be judged. The web editor(s) do not need to assist applicants with sizing photos for the web, but the can if they choose to do so.

The web editors will keep the coding information private. The name of the applicant will only be made public if the jury applicant is successful.

A vote counter that is not a web editor and does not have access to the coding information will receive and tally the votes and cut/paste the comments into a document to be forwarded to the applicant. At the end of 30 days, the vote will be considered valid if the required number of votes have been received. If there are an insufficient number of votes, the person conducting the tally can, at their discretion, decide whether to solicit additional votes from members that have not yet voted or to declare the vote invalid. Wherever possible, it is preferable to get in the remaining votes – but if the votes simply are not coming in, then the vote can be considered invalid and the member will have to re-submit at a later date.

For valid votes, the results will be forwarded to the web editor, for decoding and notification to the required parties.


Judging Applications:
Judges have 2 choices – return a score or return a “can’t tell” Please see the attached guidelines for judging prior to scoring the entry. When returning your score, please include any comments that you feel may be helpful to the applicant. Including comments is especially important if you return a score of 84 or less - please let the applicant know why, so they have some idea what needs to be improved.

Returning a score of 85 or greater in effect says - “I feel that this artist's work is up to the standards of the Guild I choose to participate in and think they should be allowed to display the guild’s juried logo.”

Returning a score of 84 or less in effect says - “I feel this applicant’s work is still evolving and that the applicant is not ready yet to display the guild's juried logo."

Returning a “Can’t Tell” -
Can Not Tell - Please Ask Artist to Resubmit Their Entry With New Pictures.
If the photos are not detailed enough that you can judge, please select this option and do not give any further consideration. Use this if the images are too small, too blurry, too grainy, too dark, etc. Anytime that you find yourself writing or thinking – from what I can see – select this option.

If 6 or more of the judges return a “can’t tell”, the score will not be tallied and the artist will be asked to resubmit their jury entry.


Tallying the Score: See the attached guidelines document.


Successful Applications:
The applicant will be notified, their name will be added to their jury application, and one of their images will be selected to for addition to the juried members gallery. If a business name and a web site with finished handmade jewelry is in the membership records, they will also be added to the entry in the juried members gallery. (Members without web sites may purchase a page from the guild’s website.) The membership records will be updated to include the juried status and date. The juried member must maintain a business membership to retain their juried status. Information in the membership records can be updated by using the "update membership information" form in the member areas.


Re-submissions:
If an applicant is not successful in their jury attempt, they may resubmit to jury. Jury submissions are limited to 2x per calendar year.






General Guidelines
JUDGING JURY APPLICATIONS
Effective 4/1/05


Last Revised: 03/10/08 (table updated)

When judging an applicant’s work, please consider the following items:

Workmanship
While the guild promotes the presentation of creative and innovative work, it should not be at the expense of workmanship. No matter what type of work and no matter what technique used, the work presented should display quality workmanship.

Creativity
The guild celebrates all forms of wire art jewelry – from tailored border wraps used to set people’s cherished special stones to proprietary techniques developed and basically used by only one artist. An artist can bring their creativity to all of the wire techniques. You may add points for creativity “above and beyond the call of duty”, but you should also respect artists doing quality border wraps and sculpted pieces.

Versatility
Can the artist play more than just chopsticks? Do they display a range of styles, or a range of techniques, or a range of jewelry types? This may not be considered as important if the artist has created a style all of their own, but for most juried members displaying more traditional techniques, it should be considered.


Looking at these areas in greater detail:

Workmanship

  • Overall control of the media -
    Does the work look like the artist had control of the wire? or does it look like the wire had control of the artist? Are symmetrical designs symmetrical? Do asymmetrical designs have balance? Does the wire flow? or does it look tortured?

  • Correct choice of wire -
    • if holding a stone, is the wire of appropriate size and temper to secure the stone without overpowering it
    • if not holding a stone, is the wire of appropriate size and temper to achieve a pleasing balance in the piece (with license for artistic expression)
    • do twisted wires have an even, consistent twist

  • Structural Connections -
    Whether wraps, coils, twists, weaves, braids, loops, knitting, crocheting, or any other type of structural interlocking of wires - work should not look sloppy. It should look like the artist had control of the wire rather than that the work was just the result of the best the artist could do with the wire.

  • Tool Marks –
    • Tool marks should not be apparent on gold-filled wire, as it impairs the integrity of the wire.
    • Judges should use their discretion on solid wires as to whether the tool marks enhance the artistic elements of a piece or detract from it.

  • "Loose" wires -
    If you look at a lot of art jewelry, there are often elements protruding out as part of the design. They are smoothed/polished and do not cause harm to the wearer, even though they might be prone to catching on frayed threads, etc. Designs that include "loose" wires (as opposed to all ends locked down) are acceptable if it looks like the wires will not cause harm to the wearer.

  • Jewelry Features -
    Something makes each thing a piece of jewelry vs an object of art - either a bail, a pin, a rink shank, a clasp, a formed cuff, an earring finding, a barrette, a comb, etc, etc. Any jewelry feature that makes a major part of the visual statement should be hand-crafted and should be well-crafted. All jewelry features should be fully operational. Bails should allow the piece to hang in proper orientation. Clasps should operate easily and stay shut when on. Pins should work smoothly. Etc, etc.

  • Manufactured Findings -
    The use of small, incidental findings is considered acceptable. Ones that are specifically ok'd are simple earring findings and snap settings for accent stones less than 8mm. Others will be at the discretion of each judge - as to whether they add or detract from the artistic presentation.

  • Stone security -
    If a stone has been used, does it look secure? or does it look like it could be easily popped out?

  • Jump Rings -
    If used, are they correctly shaped and closed in a tight and flush fashion?

Creativity
Having a few classic designs or "designs taken right out of the manual" (think WAG projects, Moods In Wire, Preston Videos, etc, etc, etc) are useful to help judge workmanship, but should not comprise more than 1/3 of the selections.

When considering the artistic and creative merit of the piece, think about
- is the composition pleasing?
- does it present the various materials used well?
- has the artist shown they can insert their own style rather than just copying standard projects?

Someone that presents all border wraps or all sculpted pieces should not necessarily be marked down on creativity - any more than someone with all knitted pieces or all freestyles or all coiled wraps or all chain/chain maille. HOWEVER, if a person decides to present pieces of all one technique, they need to show some originality in how the piece is presented and some versatility in what they can do with that technique.

For example, someone that presents
  • all border wraps, should be able to adapt the technique to freeform cabochons and/or faceted gems and create finishes that show their own unique style. The "prong wires" should be part of the design and not just something to hold the stone in. They should also be able to show more than just a pendant.

  • all sculpted pieces, should be able to adapt the technique to freeform cabochons and/or faceted gems. They should show the ability to create free-flowing designs that do not replicate from one piece to the next.

  • all chain/chain maille, should be able to adapt the standard patterns to original designs and to multiple jewelry types.

  • all textile techniques (knitting, crocheting, braiding, weaving, etc, etc) should be able to show a range of styles and types of jewelry.
When judging artistic and creative merit, judges should consider the overall artistic impression of the piece. If it is just not their style, they should not take off points - but if they think the piece is downright ugly, they may use their discretion.


Versatility
Can the artist play more than just chopsticks?

If they only do border wraps or only do sculpts or only knit or only do herringbone wraps, can they at least do a variety of jewelry types?

If they only do pendants or only do rings or only do bracelets, can they at least show a variety of techniques and styles?

There will be exceptions here - there are successful artists that really narrowly specialize. If their work is exceptional, they should not be marked down - but if their work is commonplace, then they should not be awarded a full score here.


Scoring
100 points maximum
(any scores above 100 will be reduced to 100)

85 points required to pass jury

Workmanship - 50 points maximum
Creativity - 25 points, but each judge has discretion to mark this up a bit higher, if the person really goes above and beyond the average submission
Versatility - 25 points, but each judge has discretion to mark this up a bit higher, if the person really goes above and beyond the average submission

The first question you should ask yourself - am I comfortable adding these pictures to the juried member gallery? Do they represent the quality of work I want to be associated with? If the answer to this is no - but your vote is coming out yes (or vice versa) - consider whether or not you are being objective in your scoring.


Using all of the above guidelines, please place a total score on this applicant. Do not break the score down - but you may add comments for the applicant and you can talk about the breakdown in the comments. If you have given a less than passing score, please list the reasons in your comments, so the applicant can understand where they need to improve.

No matter what - you can not give a score higher than 100.


Tallying the Score
Judging will be done by the juried members in good standing. 2/3 of the current number of juried members on the day the application is posted for judging must return a score for the application to be tallied.

A voting notice will be sent when the application is posted and an email address will be given to return the results to. The current number of juried members will be included in this email, as well as a link to these guidelines.

2/3 of the juried members returning a score must have returned a score of 85 or greater for the applicant to become a juried member. The maximum number of "no's" or "can't tells" can not be exceeded. (see chart below)

The vote will be left open for a period of 30 days. If a juried member will be gone for more than a month and will not be able to participate in juries, they should let the professional standards committee know, so that they are not “dinged” for not voting.

It is the responsibility of all juried members to participate in these scoring exercises!! Failure to do so may put your juried status in jeopardy!


# of
Juried Members
Minimum #
Judging
Minimum #
85 or more
Maximum #
84 or less
Max #
Can’t Tell’s
40 27 18 9 6
41 27 18 9 6
42 28 19 9 6
43 29 19 10 6
44 29 19 10 6
45 30 20 10 6
46 31 21 10 6
47 31 21 10 6
48 32 21 11 6
49 33 22 11 6
50 33 22 11 6
51 34 23 11 6
52 35 23 12 6
53 35 23 12 6
54 36 24 12 6
55 36 24 12 6
56 37 25 12 6
57 38 25 13 6
58 38 25 13 6
59 39 26 13 6
60 40 26 14 6
61 40 27 14 6
62 41 27 14 6




 
 

Copyright © The International Guild of Wire Jewelry Artists 2005 - 2011
All images, text, and original designs on this site are copyrighted - either by the guild or by the individual artists.
Use them for inspiration, but please do not copy them.